User talk:Harri

Archive 1

You already saw this on discord, I know, and I'm sure I'm a little early on this, but in this comment you said that if anyone wanted to do the recap, they'd best send you a talk page message. Well, here's the talk page message, though you also said you'd probably want to do it collaboratively. This was about five months ago though, so I'm also checking to see if you would be interested in a collaboration (I sure would!), and if not, that's ok, but if so, that's great! I do understand how even if you'd want to work together on this, you may want to begin a little later, but I can get started and you can help out when it suits you, if you'd like. If you'd rather start at the same time or anything, that's ok too. Whatever you might want to express, you can reply to this message :)

P.S. I noticed you archived your talk page, that's good. It feels weird to send the only message hat will be here... -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  14:42, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

By the way, I remember on the first recap there was a statistics section. I wonder if we should have that on the next one? -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  18:43, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

I would like to have one of those again yes. I could ask Cook for a pageview and edit count chart of the whole year. - Harri / 👁 Image
22:46, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Nice. I could also ask Simanelix to find some stats. Maybe he could even make a script to find all the data we need, who knows. But yeah, page views and edits are good, maybe also page creations? I like how it was on the original with it describing not only that something happened, but why it happened. There's so much potential here... -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  23:28, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

I'm happy for us to do it together. I probably won't work on it for a little while, but I'm fine with you beginning now. - Harri / 👁 Image
22:46, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

That's great! I'll really just be outlining some stuff, probably not doing much... yet. I'll try to look through some stuff and research etc. etc. to find the data we need, apart from the stuff you said above that would require Staff to do something.

(man if me from one year ago could see that I'm working with you he'd go crazy lol) -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  23:28, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

So, um... it's nearing the end of the year. Just a friendly reminder, maybe we should work on it a little(?) No pressure though. Even if it gets released after the end of the year that's fine. -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  19:30, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

I've just got back from visiting family today, at my pc again finally. Yeah it will definitely not release before the end of the year, but it will be done within a week. Have you done anything for it? - Harri / 👁 Image
15:51, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Welcome back! Sorry if I bothered you unnecessarily. I've started the rough cutout of the recap here, but I haven't done a whole load just yet -- I'll work on it a little more today. Hopefully we can get that stats section done; I already have the firs statistic (number of diffs) planned. I can also manually find other stuff like number of deletions or "mark as patrolled"-ings, from this half of the year to the last, etc. Looking forward to working on it! -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  16:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

According to the latest edits on MCW:Recap the 2025 recap has now been made by staff. I suppose that means our job here is done, kind of? -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  23:26, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

You know how in your edit here, you said "create MD if you'd like"? Well I'm just informing you that MD already exists, it just links here instead. Do you think we should change the redirect target to Minecraft Dungeons, considering people are more likely to search MD looking for Dungeons, and they're probably not searching for mendelevium. Emeraldhouse (T|C) 19:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

I think that would make sense. A pretty popular spin-off is a more likely search target than a lesser known element exclusive to Education. - Harri / 👁 Image
13:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much on editing the block settings of 2607:FB90:8A94:8012:AD2:257:B270:F34B . Lce404not found 13:07, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I noticed that you recently warned people not to recreate redirects like "Armor Trim Snapshot" when deleting them. However, this kind of warning does not have any actual effects---People are more likely to create them by using the tool in serach digest instead of clicking the red link. Therefore, they will not know that you have warned them not to recreate them. You can block these search terms in serach digest or protect them from creation to resolve the issue. ––– Aed8814 (C | T) 06:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Ah, sorry. I created that redirect not knowing it was a problem. Delete it please. Emeraldhouse (T|C) 14:36, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

I created it too because of SearchDigest, i did not see the warning. 👁 Bepis
19:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Special:SearchDigest has been locked so only administrators and directors can access the page. 👁 Bepis
17:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Not just admins and directors. Patrollers and bots can too. -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  17:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh. 👁 Bepis
17:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

I could not find your reply, so I am posting here.

The wiki rules says that rule number eleven says editing with AI is prohibited. It also says that rules 4, 5, 7, and 11 is exempt from the rules.

The person I was asking says they want to edit their userpage.

👁 Image
N3verDigStraightUp (talk) 21:05, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

I was scrolling through the Wanted Categories page and I saw one labeled "Auto Confirmed Users" but when I clicked it, it showed that you had removed it. So is it supposed to be on the Wanted Categories page and should I make it or should it be deleted from that list? 👁 Image
Redstone Engineer (Talk) 16:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Wanted categories isn't actually a list of categories that people necessarily want, it just means that at least one page is in the nonexistent category 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
16:55, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Ahh. I see now. thanks. 👁 Image
Redstone Engineer (Talk) 16:59, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

What is this edit(3332311) on your userpage about? 👁 Image
72011copperfan2👁 Image
20:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

You didn't link an edit. - Harri / 👁 Image
20:07, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't know how. 👁 Image
72011copperfan2👁 Image
20:08, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I was checking your editcount. For some time I forgot that Special:EditCount exists so I was doing it via my user page, and that time I accidentally saved the page. - Harri / 👁 Image
20:10, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Ok just curious. 👁 Image
72011copperfan2👁 Image
20:14, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Since you are a bureaucat, can you please update the default desktop skin to Vector 2022? – ~2026-RubyTuffHoney7680 (talk) 03:12, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I'm not sure that's a decision an individual admin/bureaucrat can make, but instead requires consensus, but I may be wrong. ‑‑MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 03:53, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

That would need a big discussion with the wiki community first, and I can guarantee that everyone would disagree with it. Also I'm not even a bureaucrat. - Harri / 👁 Image
10:50, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

I have a question, and I just want to clarify (sorry to bother you). I’ve been logged out of my account, and cannot log in (due to wrong password and missing email). Is it okay if I create an alt and link it to my old account. Thanks for your time! ~2026-MooshroomSnowSkeleton7915 (talk) 07:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey I'm not Harri, but yeah that's totally allowed! As long as alt accounts are not being used to evade a block and it is stated and/or obvious that the two accounts are owned by the same person, they are fine to have. 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
07:48, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! ~2026-MooshroomSnowSkeleton7915 (talk) 08:11, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I got back in! Congrats on getting admin privileges! Maxxxx Dirt Eater Alt (talk) 08:15, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I may have the wrong diff, and I dont know how code works so I may be just wrong in general, but I'm pretty sure this edit caused the Dungeons namespace to have the Dungeons II color at the top of the screen. If I am wrong and that was not what did it, or if someone else entirely did it, I apologize 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
^(he/_they) 07:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

The Dungeons namespace does not have the Dungeons II colour at the top, not on mobile or desktop and not on light mode or dark mode. - Harri / 👁 Image
09:03, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

It does for me, and it's not a caching thing, because I hadn't been in the Dungeons namespace for like a week. I had assumed it was that diff because the removed color is a deep orange and the added color is a deep blue, but again I am really sorry if it wasn't that edit or you at all 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
^(he/_they) 11:14, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

That's what it's meant to look like. It's a dark night sky. The Dungeons II theme has a dark grey. We changed the Dungeons theme recently, Oakar gave it an overhaul and I guess giving it a more normal night sky is part of that. - Harri / 👁 Image
11:43, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Ohhh! Okay, I am so sorry, I didn't know that! 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
^(he/_they) 11:55, 3 June 2026 (UTC)