Hey there! If you haven't heard, we've decided to move away from Fandom to a new, independent wiki. I noticed you've contributed quite a bit, so I'd really appreciate your input on our skin designs for the new wiki, whether you think we should enable dark or light mode by default, and if you have any other feedback. You can leave your feedback on this page. I hope you can join us over there! - Harristic (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Latest comment: 24 December 202514 comments4 people in discussion
I'd like to be unblocked in Chinese Wiki, I am now so sorry for my behavior in this wiki (such as using anonymous sock puppets), and if I am unblocked there, I will:
Never add nonsensical hatnote and wrong information;
Never ignore warning in the talk page and always follow community consensus;
And now I am requesting an unblock in zh wiki again:
1.I have explained the reason of creating "bad" reeirects in zh wiki: Redirect pages are "hidden" from normal readers because they prefer reading content pages, so creating redirect pages isn't as disruptive as adding nonsense content to content pages. (Sorry, I forgot to make a promise on time in zh wiki)
2.I always add functional interwiki links when I remove other nonfunctional links there, so these edits are at least not disruptive. Consensus is not needed when removing nonfunctional content.
If I get unblocked in zh wiki again, I will stop creating redirects for a period of time and just continue to take part in discussions and maintain interlanguage links there. ––– Aed8814(C | T)05:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your unblock request. However, the request is 👁 Image Denied.
The core reason is that you appeal itself demonstrates the same behavioral pattern that led to your block: you prioritize your personal judgment over community consensus and policies.
You argue that creating "bad" redirects is "not as disruptive", because they are "hidden". This proves that you still refuse to accept policies on Chinese Wiki, but instead defer only to your opinion.
You state that "consensus is not needed" for your edits. This is the exact mindset that caused your initial block. A wiki can not function if individuals override community standards based on their own views.
Your promise to stop creating redirects "for a period of time" shows that you see this is a temporary pause, not a solution. The real issue is your behavioral pattern, not just one type of edit.
Your appeal provides no evidence of substantive change. Therefore, the block remains. --XiaoXin666 () 06:45, 24 November 2025 (UTC) (Last edited on 07:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC))
Can you unblock me in zh wiki?
I used to think making substantial edits can bring popularity, and this thought had always affected me ---- To "gain popularity", I didn't care my edits' quality: If my edits seemed to be OK, I would submit them without further searching or thinking. In addition, I treated the warnings in my talk pages as spam and dealt with them by demonstrating that my behavior was correct and others' warnings were invalid, in order to make myself comfortable.
Now I have realized that I am able to guarantee both the quality and the frequency of my edits, and the attempt to "gain popularity" in a wiki was very silly and had brought something bad to me instead. I will do sufficient search if I can't judge if my edits are actually acceptable. Or maybe I will only maintain interlanguage links and take part in discussions.––– Aed8814(C | T)18:59, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
While your introspection has changed in tone, this does not address the fundamental reasons for your block. The block was not merely due to poor-quality edits or a desire for popularity.
You demonstrated a persistent behavioral pattern of prioritizing personal judgment over community consensus and policies that continued even after your previous unblock and was evident in your prior appeals.
Your promise to guarantee quality based on your own judgment, rather than a commitment to adherence to community consensus and policies, indicates that the core behavioral pattern remains unacknowledged and unresolved.
A successful appeal requires substantive change reflected in a sufficient understanding and acceptance of community standard, not merely a reinterpretation of personal motivation. You have failed to provide evidence of such change.
"I will do sufficient search if I can't judge my edits are actually acceptable" means that I will read community consensus, policies, etc. and think carefully before I submit my edits (If the content I am editing in zh wiki already exists in en wiki). Or again, I may stop copying content from en wiki to zh wiki at all and only do maintenance edits.
Your lastest comment further demonstrates that our dialogue has entered an unproductive cycle. You continue to elaborate on and propose changes to technical details while failing to address the core issue: namely, your behavioral pattern of prioritizing personal judgment over community consensus and policies.
Regarding the editing restriction on your talk page on Chinese Wiki, this is standard setting following indefinite block. Moreover, you were given a prior opportunity but failed to demonstrate any substantive progress.
As you have failed to show any substantive change regarding aforementioned core issue, and as this communication once again exhibites the same behavioral pattern, your unblock request remains 👁 Image Denied.
Let me tell you my past behavior pattern and thought:
1.I used to judge if my behavior was acceptable only by analyzing its short-term consequences instead of the behavior itself and its long-term consequences;
2.I used to thought it was OK to do things that seemed to be acceptable, were lawful but actually disruptive in the Internet; That was because people can ignore and block these behaviors by using technology, but they can't do this easily in real life. ––– Aed8814(C | T)04:37, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
As I hadn't seen warnings like "Users who add content violating the style guide will be warned or blocked" in the wiki, I thought it was not important to follow consensus, policies, etc. At first, I only received some subtle warnings, so I believed it was right to prioritize my personal thought over policies, guidelines, etc. ---- Then I started to only believe in myself and ignore others' comments to me. That's why I ignored further talk page warnings, used anonymous sockpuppets to evade blocks and made edits without consensus. ––– Aed8814(C | T)04:47, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
I haven't reflected myself and discarded my past behavior pattern until you denied my unblock request for the first time. To correct my behavior, I decided to treat the content of my edits and the long-term consequences as being more important than my short-term thought ---- Specifically, I will treat the policies, guidelines, etc. as being as compulsory as legal demands (such as Minecraft's EULA). ––– Aed8814(C | T)04:56, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
More specifically, I will learn from existing content, admit admins and patrollers' being experienced and respect their comments to me. At least please don't block me indefinitely in zh wiki. ––– Aed8814(C | T)04:18, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Dude just take couple months off editing. You seem to be keeping on trying to game a system instead of editing because you want to make contributions. Come back once you have your priorities in order. Nixinova T ⁄ C04:34, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
I and another user have reminded you not to remove "nonfunctional" interwiki links just yesterday, but you still say they need to be removed without providing appropriate reasons. Thus, unfortunately, I think you are moving further away from being unblocked again (on zh). AblazeVase69188（留言 | 贡献） 15:56, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
You may use /experience query @s points command to check your accurate experience points instead of glancing. Don TruenoT/C13:56, 15 December 2025 (UTC) (Last edited on 14:12, 15 December 2025 (UTC))
