AMD EPYC 9755 / 9575F / 9965 Benchmarks Show Dominating Performance
The 192-core Turin dense core EPYC 9965 processor was performing great with the OpenMP-threaded John The Ripper program.
The generational gains in power efficiency were exceeding my expectations and shooting far ahead of Intel Granite Rapids.
The AMD EPYC 9005 processors were delivering leading performance within the ClickHouse database server. Yes, the Xeon 6980P processors do perform very poorly in this particular benchmark. It's an issue that Intel has still been investigating, so for now don't give too much weight to the GNR numbers while EPYC 9005 series is leading.
On a performance-per-Watt basis, the Xeon 6 Sierra Forest E-core processors did manage to come out slightly ahead of the EPYC 9755 Turin dense processor.
The 5th Gen EPYC processors were delivering better performance-per-dollar over Intel Sierra Forest and Granite Rapids.
With RocksDB the 128-core EPYC 9755 was outperforming the Xeon 6980P processors and then the 192-core EPYC 9965 Turin dense processor easily captured the crown. The EPYC 9965 managed to deliver the best performance per Watt.