User talk:Nesekf

👁 Image
Please do not remove content without explained removal, as you did on Java Edition Classic 0.0.13a. Your edit have been reverted due to removing content. If you would like to experiment, please use the Minecraft Wiki:Sandbox or your sandbox. Thank you. 92.53.21.134 17:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

How admin-like. 100.7.29.185 17:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Im telling you to not remove content 92.53.21.134 19:25, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Huh what 100.7.29.185 is doing here? 92.53.21.134 20:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I remove the picture with lava, because it's taken fron developer build Nesekf () 07:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Ok, it was a developer build 92.53.21.223 12:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I cannot remove the gallery section, my action has been disallowed by an edit filter 92.53.21.223 12:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
Please stop. If you continue to remove contents from Minecraft Wiki, as you did on Java Edition Infdev, you may be blocked from editing. 92.53.21.213 11:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Info about kicking to main menu without proxy is already mentioned below, so your content is just a dublicate.

Also you're not admin, so you can't block me Nesekf () 11:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I tested infdev versions on betacraft, black screen just appears after the world was generated, exept infdev 20100624 and up 92.53.21.213 11:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I know, but that info was already mentioned below

See this picture if you thinks what it's not mentioned

👁 Image
Nesekf () 12:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Ok........ 92.53.21.213 12:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

There you added information to how the game freezed when raining, so can you explain me how the game freezed? 185.100.244.143 17:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

I only know what it will spam "java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException" in the console Nesekf () 18:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
Please stop adding or changing lincense templates without giving a reason in edit summary, as you did in various file pages. This can result your edit being reverted if you add or change the templates that it was not minecraft related, repeatedly changing it will result you being blocked from editing. 185.100.244.97 16:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Are you alt account of 92.53.21.0/24? Nesekf () 16:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Littering talk pages with baseless and unwarranted threats may result in you being blocked. - Harristic / Talk 👁 Image
16:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Are you sure that indev 20100212-1210 fixed the game freezing during rain and infdev 20100627 fixed the game crashing when windows height was changed to 0? 185.100.244.83 10:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Are you really can't reproduce them? Nesekf () 10:32, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

I can bro 185.100.244.83 10:33, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

If you can reproduce them, why you asking me about it? Nesekf () 10:36, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Belive 2 versions have fixed the bug 185.100.244.83 10:43, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Do not revert edits without reason 185.100.244.169 16:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Do not add fake screenshots to the page, also you're not admin Nesekf () 16:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, thats not a fake screenshot 185.100.244.169 21:19, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) anyone can give user warnings, but just admins. But using them to span a talk page is definitely not allowed. -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  21:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

You might want to stop constantly reverting other users' edits to pages for no reason. Not only are your edits grammatically (and functionally) incorrect, but this is considered edit warring under like every Wiki in existence's policies. 👁 Image
reverentpsycho | Talk 👁 Image
23:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

He got blocked so there was no need to reply to this. 2601:981:4401:1CC0:B17C:7EFA:D9AD:1707 23:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC) 2601:981:4401:1CC0:B17C:7EFA:D9AD:1707 23:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

I've unblocked you as I believe that you were making a mistake. However, do not make super large pages (> 2 MB) in the future again. Your edit made the page so large it cannot be displayed properly. GIM Dianliang233 (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

What exactly do you mean by the logo "failing the test"? It's a registered trademark by a legal entity. Realshow19 (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Firstly: read this

Secondly: trademark ≠ copyrighted content. Nesekf () 15:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

This hardly answers my question, the logo is marked for a reason. Realshow19 (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

trademark ≠ copyrighted content

If picture fails threshold of originality, doesn't matter if its trademark, it becomes public domain. Nesekf () 16:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

If you go to the Element Animation website, you can clearly see that they have a copyright. Realshow19 (talk) 16:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

I'll re-type my reply:

trademark ≠ copyrighted content

If picture fails threshold of originality, doesn't matter if its trademark, it becomes public domain. Nesekf () 16:14, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure it's more complex than this, otherwise most of the logos we have on record would be public domain. Realshow19 (talk) 16:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

No. Google, Amazon, Ford, etc. logos are in the public domain because they can be reproduced by literally anyone. They're not copyrighted but they're trademarks and the latter is why you can't reuse them commercially without asking, not the first. Arina (she/her) 16:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Btw Mojang logo is in the public domain too. Arina (she/her) 16:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Do not falsely accuse others of vandalism, as you did in this edit. This was clearly not vandalism. Arina (she/her) 10:08, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Not sure what the purpose of these edits is. The visual editor automatically adds whitespace whenever the infobox is edited so your edits are not going to last long.  Nixinova   T   C   11:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Again - why are you making these edits. They accomplish quite literally nothing and spam up recentchanges.  Nixinova   T   C   10:41, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Not only do they spam RC, but someone will have to patrol all those edits. -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  14:56, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Nevermind, but when non-patrollers are patrolling Rc, the edits are pretty obnoxious. -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  14:57, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! I noticed a recent page move of yours created a lot of Broken redirects, meaning they now redirect to a nonexistent page. Could you fix these broken redirects? If not, I could fix them. Thank you! -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  16:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

fixed Nesekf () 18:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! I noticed that you have moved some version pages on zh wiki. Since this has not been discussed on zh, I have cancelled your operation. Thank you for your understanding! 👁 Image
Villager-bloc-h（讨论 | 贡献） 02:42, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I am a editor from zh wiki. I noticed that you have recently moved many historical versions of pages in zh wiki. I know en wiki has discussed to use a timestamp to name version, but there is still no discussion on zhwiki, and your move will be reverted with '无共识更改 (changes without consensus )'. Just a reminder that other languages wikis are not subsidiaries of the en wiki, changes there still require consensus in the respective language. I hope you can take note of this. DXGdoude |Talk 02:51, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

I have one question: does this noted in the MCW:RULES? Nesekf () 13:30, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

No. But zh wiki has an article named “Minecraft Wiki不是什么 (Minecraft Wiki is not ... )”. I think you might need to read MCW:NOT#ENGLISH paragraph. Specifically, editing in zh wiki requires following the consensus of zh wiki. Although it may not be necessary, I still need to remind you that some people have been banned forever in zh wiki because of doing this many times. DXGdoude |Talk 07:33, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Another question: it is allowed create rules in the translations wikis what not exist on the main wiki? Nesekf () 07:35, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

I mean consensus, not rules. I can also say that MCW:rules do not note that other language wikis must follow what en wiki does. I think you should understand the scope of MCW:rules, or there is no need to continue this conversation. DXGdoude |Talk 10:11, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

I want say you one thing: on another wikis there's no discussions about renaming indev and infdev versions, but they start renaming versions like on the main wiki.

Also, there's no discussion on mainwiki about adding more versions to be same like in Omniarchive index, but admins didn't revert my edits as a "non-consensus changes".

If you want what your wiki is "independed", thats your opinion and i cannot change it. Nesekf () 11:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! They left those messages just because they were holding that in ZH Wiki it's improper to move a lot of pages without discussion. And I also think so. Notice that ZH Wiki hadn't yet talked about whether to rename these old versions after their publish timestamp. So currently we thought it's better to leave them as they are. Anyway, if you found any interwiki links missing or wrong besides this problem, just feel free to fix that! Don Trueno T/C 07:58, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

its not an answer of my question. Nesekf () 09:46, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

It is noted in zhMCW's wiki rules that by deliberately not obeying consensus (zhMCW's R#2.5), your edits might be treated as disruptive. There have been lots of differences going on between all language wikis, such as naming schemas of version pages. One language wiki don't need to provide a translated version of their rules, as naturally they don't target other languages. Again, please acknowledge that English Minecraft Wiki is NOT "the main wiki", all wikis are treated the same and are in fact not translated version of English Minecraft Wiki. Since editors from zhMCW noticed that they don't want the change, I'd say you should probably follow it rather than moving the pages again.

I'd explain the version naming schema in details. It has been the norm that zhMCW don't follow enMCW's version naming schema immediately; we only starts to do it when we feel necessary, as in Chinese we might expect different cases or different forms sometimes, so it could be normal for other language wikis to follow EN's change, and for zhMCW they keep it the old way for quite a while, or no change at all. --  Lakejason0 (Talk • Contribs) 11:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC) (Last edited on 11:42, 5 October 2025 (UTC))

👁 Image
There is currently a discussion at the admin noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 👁 Image
Dazzle 👁 Image
20:03, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
Please refrain from fishing for users to block. It is very invasive. If you have a legitimate concern that a user is underage, please contact the administrators with evidence instead of trying to get the user to fess up. Being under 13 is only a TOS rule, and users are only to be blocked if they admit it themselves. Otherwise they are fully able to become constructive wiki users if they fly under the radar (proof:me). So please, don't fish for reasons to block people.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  21:11, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Please verify the PVNs you add are correct, it seems you just incremented it by one instead of checking in game.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  18:15, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

The PVNs is possibly wrong, i just quickly add them in module after snapshot release and often without checking them.

I assumed what if number is wrong someone will already fix them on the same day when i added it. But due to you found this mistake only today, i think should less trust users. Nesekf () 19:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

It's better for it to be pending than to be wrong. People would just assume you've checked them if you add them.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  19:45, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

I see you've found another way to make a lot of edits that make no changes to the pages and will be superceded by any visual editor edit. I don't know why you need to spam up recent changes with these no-op edits.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  10:22, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

I doing it to make weight of the pages smaller.

It's might be helpful for people with limited or slow internet. Nesekf () 10:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) it really won't. In fact it'll just make it take longer for the servers and to load up edit history. -~- Nerdguy2000   Talk   Edits  15:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

That's absolutely not a thing. Any change to a couple of bytes is negligible.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  19:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Oh please, for the last time these edits are useless. You really shouldn't make them. -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  16:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
Hello Nesekf, and thank you for your edits to the Minecraft Wiki. However, it has been noted that some of your edits may have grammar issues. Please make sure to check your grammar. Thank you. 👁 Image
Dazzle ^{[ talk | edits ]} 07:26, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

I know, English is not my native language. Nesekf () 08:08, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I recently noticed that you changed b1.9-pre3-1350 from reupload1 to the original version. Can you tell me what the reason for this change is? DXGdoude |Talk 04:07, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Go to Omniarchive index Nesekf () 09:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

I know omniarchive index, but this tweet showed that b1.9-pre3 was reuploaded twice. Including the original version and two reupload versions, there are three versions in total. Can you tell me your opinion about this? DXGdoude |Talk 13:24, 22 December 2025 (UTC) (Last edited on 13:27, 22 December 2025 (UTC))

There's no more mentions about -1358 reupload, exept that tweet.

Almost same situation with a1.2.3_03: this tweet published several minutes before release of _04, but all known mentions about update (after the tweet) on IRC logs or on forums is published when _04 is released, so _03 very possibly not exist. Nesekf () 16:48, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. DXGdoude |Talk 12:55, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://minecraft.wiki/w/User_talk:Nesekf?oldid=3332075"