Allthough the description for the version format is correct it technically is not for only the version that is used as an example. As rd-160052 is indeed mislabeled (it was created at 00:42 - see versions own page). maybe it would be better to just use rd-132211 instead. I don't know if it is needed to explain the mislabeling of rd-160052 on this page as it would distract from the version format and rather would make things less comprehensive. ~~~ Fulgorth (talk) 23:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Should we split this page into Version formats and Version formats/2026 onwards? Consensus will decide whether this page should be split or not. 👁 Image
Dazzle 👁 Image
11:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Not needed. The '2026 onwards' section's content should really be merged into the edition-specific sections, with just a general overview of the 1.x -> YY.x system left there. Nixinova T ⁄ C 11:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- 👁 Image
Oppose. The fundamental changes to the versioning system do not warrant a separate page, as versioning is not actually too much different to before, especially on Bedrock Edition. 👁 align=top
Sightnado ( talk / contribs ) 19:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- 👁 Image
Nope, this page is supposed to be a comprehensive guide to the game versioning in general, no matter the era. Grzesiek11 (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Used in the navbox KirillVT (talk) 08:48, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- I 👁 Image
Support splitting KirillVT (Chat) 👁 Image
👁 Image
👁 Image
08:59, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- 👁 Image
Oppose since it is only the numbers changing 👁 Image
NmF (talk) 12:48, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- 👁 Image
Oppose. It's not necessary and there's not enough content to split the page. –LauraFi - talk 20:34, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
