A router upgrade means the old router gets tossed in a drawer or thrown away. But I try to repurpose it. A couple of months ago, I turned my old ASUS RT-AC66U router into an access point. Later, I repositioned my main router, and then coverage stopped being an issue. Obviously, that meant sending the older router back into the drawer.

I decided to continue using my old router on my network until it lasts — after all, it still worked, so I set it up as a dedicated smart home network. Gradually, I realized how it solved two problems at once for my home network.

Dealing with a messy smart home

No plan but only devices

I’ve been slowly building my smart home over the past few months. Like many people, I never really planned it properly and just kept on adding devices. Before I fired up Home Assistant for the first time, my home already had a smart TV, a Fire TV, an Apple TV, a HomePod, Philips Hue bulbs, and a couple of other things.

All those devices live on the same network as my phones, laptops, and desktop. I never bothered checking the network chaos and chatter caused by the constant plugging in of ESP32-based devices and sensor nodes. However, the security implications of cheap smart devices sharing the network with my personal devices had been nagging at me for a while, and I needed a good reason to finally do something about it.

👁 XDA
Quiz
8 Questions · Test Your Knowledge

Routers and network storage
Trivia challenge

Think you know your NAS from your USB — put your home networking knowledge to the test.

HardwareNetworkingStorageProtocolsFeatures
01 / 8Hardware

What does the USB port on a typical home router most commonly allow you to do?

Correct! A USB port on a router is most commonly used to attach a flash drive or external hard drive, turning it into a basic network-attached storage device. This lets every device on your network access shared files without needing a dedicated NAS box.
Not quite. The primary use of a router's USB port is to share a connected storage device across your local network. While some routers can trickle-charge devices, that's a secondary and uncommon feature, not the main purpose.
02 / 8Protocols

Which protocol does a router typically use to share a USB-connected hard drive as network storage on a Windows network?

Correct! SMB, also known as Samba on Linux-based systems, is the standard protocol routers use to share USB storage with Windows PCs. It allows Windows Explorer to browse and access network shares just like a local folder.
Not quite. While some routers also support FTP or DLNA for media streaming, SMB is the dominant protocol for file sharing on Windows networks. It is what lets you map a network drive and browse files seamlessly in Windows Explorer.
03 / 8Storage

What is the main limitation of using a router's USB port for storage compared to a dedicated NAS device?

Correct! Routers are designed primarily for routing traffic, so their processors and memory are not optimized for heavy file serving. Transfer speeds are often significantly slower than a dedicated NAS, and advanced features like RAID, user quotas, and media transcoding are usually absent.
Not quite. The real drawback is performance and features. Router USB storage works fine over Wi-Fi and supports multiple file systems, but the router's CPU and RAM simply cannot match a dedicated NAS for sustained transfers, multi-user access, or advanced storage management.
04 / 8Networking

Which of the following router brands was among the first to popularize USB ports on consumer routers for network storage around the late 2000s?

Correct! Netgear was an early champion of USB-equipped consumer routers, prominently featuring ReadySHARE technology on routers like the Nighthawk series. ReadySHARE made it easy for users to plug in a USB drive and instantly share it across the home network.
Not quite. While ASUS and D-Link also added USB ports to routers, Netgear stood out early on with its ReadySHARE branding, which specifically marketed USB network storage as a headline feature on consumer routers in the late 2000s and early 2010s.
05 / 8Features

What additional function beyond file sharing do many routers with USB ports offer using a connected USB device?

Correct! Many USB-equipped routers include a print server function, allowing a standard USB printer to be plugged into the router and shared with every device on the network. This eliminates the need for a dedicated print server device or leaving a PC on just to print.
Not quite. While the other options sound plausible, printer sharing is the real bonus feature. USB print server functionality is built into many routers from ASUS, Netgear, and TP-Link, letting the whole household print without anyone needing to be physically connected to the printer.
06 / 8Storage

Which file system format is most advanced and broadly supported by router USB storage features for compatibility across Windows, macOS, and Linux?

Correct! exFAT offers the best cross-platform compatibility without the 4GB file size limit that plagues FAT32. Most modern routers support exFAT natively, and Windows, macOS, and Linux can all read and write to it without extra drivers, making it the practical choice for shared USB drives.
Not quite. FAT32 has a crippling 4GB per-file limit, and APFS is Apple-only. While NTFS is common on Windows drives, some routers only offer read-only NTFS support. exFAT hits the sweet spot of broad compatibility and support for large files on router-based USB storage.
07 / 8Hardware

The ASUS RT-AX88U and similar high-end routers often include USB 3.0 ports alongside USB 2.0. What is the primary advantage of USB 3.0 for network storage?

Correct! USB 3.0 offers theoretical speeds up to 5Gbps compared to USB 2.0's 480Mbps, which is roughly a 10x improvement. For router-based NAS usage, this means faster file transfers to and from the connected drive, especially noticeable when copying large files like videos or backups.
Not quite. The key benefit of USB 3.0 over USB 2.0 is raw transfer speed — up to 5Gbps versus 480Mbps. While the router's CPU may still be a bottleneck, a USB 3.0 port ensures the drive interface itself isn't limiting your network storage performance.
08 / 8Networking

Some routers with USB ports allow remote access to attached storage over the internet. Which technology is most commonly used to enable this securely?

Correct! A built-in VPN server, commonly OpenVPN or WireGuard on modern routers, is the secure way to access your router's USB storage remotely. You connect to your home VPN first, then browse the network share as if you were sitting at home, keeping your data protected from the open internet.
Not quite. Exposing SMB directly to the internet is a serious security risk and how many home networks get compromised. The correct approach is using the router's built-in VPN server — available on routers from ASUS, Netgear, and others — to create an encrypted tunnel before accessing your home storage remotely.
Challenge Complete

Your Score

/ 8

Thanks for playing!

For a couple of months, I ran an IoT VLAN for smart devices, and it worked fine. But I always kept second-guessing the firewall rules I created in OPNsense on Proxmox. Turns out, I had a long, exhausting list of rules. So I tried a different approach with a specific piece of hardware.

An old router gets a dedicated job

Giving it a second life

Even though the AC66U is a Wi-Fi 5 router that you wouldn’t buy today, it’s still useful. It has a decent build quality and dual-band support. The one crucial reason I still considered it: support from community firmware projects for older Broadcom chip-based routers. I picked FreshTomato since it continues to receive updates even in 2026 and gives capabilities that were absent from most stock firmware. That’s remarkable for such old router hardware.

The best part was that it didn’t cost me anything to carry out this project. I already owned the router and had a couple of Ethernet cables sitting in a box. So if you've got an old router gathering dust, put it to good use. But first, check FreshTomato’s hardware compatibility before flashing it.

Setting up an old router as a smart home network was easy

There was a catch, though

I flashed the latest FreshTomato 2026.2 firmware on the AC66U and connected it to my main router (AX88U) using an Ethernet cable. The physical setup was straightforward: one end of an Ethernet cable plugged into a LAN port on the main router (AX88U), and the other into the WAN port on the AC66U. I switched the WAN on the AC66U to DHCP mode, and it automatically assigned an IP address from the main network. With the internet working through AC66U, the first hurdle was cleared.

In FreshTomato’s interface, I renamed the 2.4GHz SSID to Smart Home and set a password. Since most IoT devices operate on 2.4 GHz, I turned off the 5GHz band entirely. For the virtual interface (Advanced -> Virtual Wireless), I assigned a dedicated subnet separate from the one on the main router. That’s to isolate the smart devices completely from the main network at the routing level.

One honest catch: connecting the older router to the main router using an Ethernet cable. I hoped to set up and connect my old router to the main router wirelessly, without running a cable. Recent FreshTomato builds removed wireless client mode for the MIPS RT-AC devices. A cable is a more reliable solution. After setting up the network, putting Home Assistant over turned out to be yet another decision.

Moving Home Assistant to a smart network is tricky

Extra step for Proxmox users

Creating a dedicated smart home network means the smart home hub must be on that network as well. If you run Home Assistant on a Pi, then connect its Ethernet port to the LAN port of the older router. But if you run Home Assistant in a VM, as I do, you’ll need to use a second NIC.

Since my mini PC had a second NIC available, I plugged it into the LAN port of the AC66U router. In Proxmox, I created a new Linux bridge (vmbr1) for that NIC and attached it to the Home Assistant VM as a second network adapter. Home Assistant now has one foot on both networks. On the primary network, it manages media players and receives commands from my phone to control Apple TV and HomePod.

Meanwhile, it remains reachable through an IP on a different subnet and connects to the smart home SSID. I set up a DHCP reservation on the older router to ensure Home Assistant's IP never changes. Running Home Assistant on a Raspberry Pi? Just connect the Pi directly to a LAN port on the older router. Since the Pi only has one Ethernet port, move Home Assistant entirely onto the IoT network, and you’re done.

Two problems got solved, one I didn’t expect

Isolation and peace of mind

The first problem is security. The smart devices are now on their own isolated subnet. Even if a cheap smart plug gets compromised, it can’t touch anything on my main network. Home Assistant only reaches smart devices through a separate network interface, whereas IoT devices can’t initiate connections to the main network.

Deals

Save on Routers & Networking Deals for Home Segmentation

Discover deals and discounts on routers, switches, access points, Ethernet cables, and network adapters to create a secure, segmented smart-home network. Explore storage & networking offers to save on wired backhaul, NAS, and IoT isolation gear.

The second problem that rarely gets enough attention is maintenance overhead. Running a home lab is my passion, but maintaining enterprise-grade complexity for a home network isn’t. I tried setting up VLANs using OPNsense on my mini PC before settling on this setup. Though it sounds technically superior, I constantly looked over my shoulder, wondering if I left a hole with a missing firewall rule. Or worse, discovering that a newly added device had quietly broken something I hadn’t accounted for.

That kind of persistent uncertainty is exhausting and defeats the purpose of a home network that just works. The old router sidesteps all that. With two routers, I get two networks with natural isolation and no firewall rules to audit or second guess. The home network is the one I completely understand and can troubleshoot confidently when something stops working late at night.

Sometimes the simplest solution is the right one

Like Occam’s Razor principle, the simple answer is the correct one. An old router and an Ethernet cable are enough for home segmentation. That’s how I should’ve built it from the start. It’s now running reliably using hardware I almost threw away. I don’t have to write any firewall rules or maintain tight VLAN configs. For my home network and home lab, peace of mind is worth more than architectural elegance.

Home Assistant
OS
Windows, macOS, Linux
iOS compatible
Yes
Android compatible
Yes