Talk:Achievement

The page should be split into a couple of categories, due to its length, and to keep consistent with the Java version. Maybe bronze/silver/gold division 👁 Image
User:Silver The Hedgehog06 👁 Image
22:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Conditionally support the split, as long as consensus is reached over at Talk:Advancement as well. 👁 Image
 Oppose going by PS Trophies. If I wasnt already familiar with how PlayStation's Trophies work, I would have no clue what you were talking about. 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
22:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Oppose, that would scatter all information on multiple pages which doesn't help at all. The achievement list isn't even that long. Also, there are many categories you could split it on, such as the new progression categories and update categories, but I'd definetely not split it based on PS trophies. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk) (contribs) 👁 Image
22:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

This is mostly discussed because Advancement is also proposed to be split and the consistency would be needed. I also oppose the split for both pages though. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 02:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Strong oppose for the same reason as for splitting Advancement. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 02:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

I 👁 Image
 Oppose splitting based on PS trophy tiers, since those articles would be about the tiers themselves which aren't notable Minecraft features at all. Same reason as to why I oppose splitting Advancements by menu tabs. 👁 Image
GameCatastrophe (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Advancement menu tabs are visible in-game and is something explicitly programmed by Mojang, whereas the PS trophy tiers is just a thing made by PS. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 02:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Another reason to oppose: it's too platform specific for PlayStation. Outrowed (talk) 02:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

I didn't mean to imply that the menu tabs aren't Minecraft features, what I meant is that the tabs themselves don't warrant articles. A page titled "Husbandry (Advancement tab)" would really be just a list of advancements with nothing about the subject matter, so it would be better as a transclusion, or at most a subpage. But that's neither here nor there. 👁 Image
GameCatastrophe (talk) 02:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Oh, then I agree. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 02:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Oppose per MinecraftBedrockPlayer7. A chronological achievement order would be better, for when the player gets their first achievement to the last, and I would rather splitting them into sections in the current article, not pages. Outrowed (talk) 02:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Comment: If this page isn't split, it would be weird to split Advancement as it would look super inconsistent. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 02:20, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Agree 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
02:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Guys… What have I started… 👁 Image
User:Silver The Hedgehog06 👁 Image
16:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Are these categories real. If not, maybe add Mob Kabob to combat. 👁 Image
Thecoolmantv2 (talk) 14:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

These categories exist in game, but they were not on my device (kindle fire) until recently, and were on play station earlier, so they might not be on your device yet. Mob Kabob is in "other" in game, even when sorted by date added. Catscratcher07 (talk) 15:22, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I just don’t have an account 👁 Image
Thecoolmantv2 (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Mob Kabob being in other when sorted by date is a bug, look MCPE-235437, it is confirmed (as a bug) ~2026-OceanSwordEndermite1676 (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I still got the achievement using only the original copper blocks after the copper age update, but the achievement is linked In the achievements sections of oxidizable blocks introduced after the original introduction of copper, but not during the copper age. Can it be obtained with any combination of copper blocks, or only the originals?

(this topic was archived but was never resolved, so I reposted it.) Catscratcher07 (talk) 20:55, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I have no source, so it cant be added to the page, but when I got the achievement pre The Copper Age in bedrock, it hadn't been updated to contain the blocks from 1.21. I didn't see anything in any changelog to suggest it had been updated to contain the new-new copper blocks. Afaik, it still only counts the original blocks in bedrock. Xxd3stroy3rxX (talk) 05:01, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

The description of the Revaulting achievement shouldn’t be unlock an ominous vault with an ominous key? Or it is also wrong in normal Minecraft (so you can post it in Mojira)? ~2026-NautilusPhantomPanda2670 (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Fixed. Perhaps it was grammatically incorrect in the game itself in the past, but it definitely isn't now. 👁 Image
Sightnado ^{t | c} 19:18, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

I saw that achievements went to old organization (before 1.21.120) ~2026-ZoglinRabbitMountain7031 (talk) 21:05, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

see mcpe- 237458 ~2026-TraderArmadilloPenguin10981 (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

wont you see? passed months ~2026-EmeraldDragonSlime9310 (talk) 20:48, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

This cannot be added unless there is a source to confirm that it is an intentional reference. - Harri / Talk 👁 Image
15:12, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

This is not a possible reference, Bad Piggies was released long after the relevant achievement was added to Minecraft. 👁 Image
Sightnado ^{t | c} 16:54, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

On the Xbox App, Mob Kabob is titled Mob Kebab, yet on the wiki it is referred to as Mob Kabob Ianslayer13 (talk) 11:31, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

The wiki uses American English. You probably have some other English variant. 👁 Image
Miner (👁 Image
talk 👁 Image
contributions) 11:45, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

You're right, I never considered that achievement names would also be translated. Thanks for the clarification, should I remove my comment? Ianslayer13 (talk) 11:52, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

MCW:Talk page guidelines says: "Do not delete topics or comments unless they are your own topic/comment and they have not been replied to, except when archiving or if the topic violates one of the other guidelines." Since your comment has been replied to and it doesn't seem to violate the guidelines, I don't see any reason for it to be deleted. 👁 Image
Miner (👁 Image
talk 👁 Image
contributions) 11:59, 16 June 2026 (UTC)