![]() |
VOOZH | about |
Choosing the right database management system (DBMS) can have a significant impact on the performance, scalability, and flexibility of our applications. Two popular options are Microsoft SQL Server (MS SQL Server) and PostgreSQL, both of which have unique features, strengths, and use cases.
In this article, we will explain the difference between MS SQL Server and PostgreSQL in detail with its advantages and disadvantages.
| Feature | MS SQL Server | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Developed by Microsoft, released April 24, 1989 | Developed by PostgreSQL Global Development Group, 1989 |
| Languages | Written in C++ | Written in C |
| License | Commercial | Open Source |
| Primary Database Model | Relational DBMS | Relational DBMS |
| Secondary Database Models | Document store, Graph DBMS | Document store |
| Supported Operating Systems | Windows, Linux | Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Unix, Windows, OS X |
| Partitioning Methods | Horizontal partitioning, sharding through federation | Range, list, and hash partitioning |
| Replication | Depends on the SQL Server edition (various types) | Supports Master-Master replication |
| In-memory Capabilities | Yes, supports in-memory storage for faster queries | No, does not natively support in-memory capabilities |
| MS SQL Server | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Pros | Excellent integration with Microsoft tools | High licensing costs |
| In-memory capabilities for high performance | Platform-dependent | |
| PostgreSQL | Open-source and free to use | Lacks in-memory capabilities |
| Cross-platform support | May require more manual tuning for performance optimization | |
| Extensible and supports advanced features |