Talk:Lego Minecraft

I oppose deletion of the article, as LEGO is actually bringing a set of Minecraft LEGO in production. I feel that this is worthy of an article.--Quatroking - MCWiki Administrator 04:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Ah, good point. The way the article is currently written, lacking links or references, it sounded like it would be a fan-made LEGO-inspired texture pack. -- Orthotope 05:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

I kinda ripped the info from Wikipedia, so the infobox needs to be tweaked a bit.. and the article improved/revised. - Asterick6 06:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

So, the lego set costs MORE than the game itself? i know that Minecraft IS pretty cheap, but, seriously,how can the lego set cost more than the game? It's strange. -Rampardos18 15:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Because LEGO is one of the most overpriced brands out there. Unfortunately this is a fairly typical price for a set like this. MetaAmbience (talk) 00:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

No, think about it. It is not overpriced. You have huge machines using electricity which costs money then you have to buy the plastic from plastic makers which costs money and then you have to sell it and much more. @how can the lego set cost more than the game? It's strange. Not it's not, It happens with everything. It is called Loss and profit. Loss= money to make the Lego. Profit= selling it. The killing game fartnite has nerf guns which cost up to $150 dollars to buy. No offense but is is not strange and it make total sense. 73.89.66.98 19:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

When I received my set, instead of including Steve and a Creeper, it had two Steve's- with completely white eyes! Herobrine does NOT EXIST!!! 22:25, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

That is called a misprint. The machine missed the eyes. I have one like that. I use him on the bad guy side. 73.89.66.98 19:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

This page deserves more recognition and is more or less orphaned on the wiki, apart from a few minor links. I propose that Lego Minecraft, at the least, should be included on the navigation bar of Minecraft, as seen at the bottom of Minecraft. –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk
Contribs
Edit count 11:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

hey you don't have a pic of the chicken banner from the chicken farm set (i think) i will gladly give a pic if needed --CrazyCat (talk) 12:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

There is a new version/variant of the lego hoglin in the set 21255 BZ715 (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Taken care of. Realshow19 (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

The witch minifigure has a second version, with a different hat SVP1234567 (talk) 03:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

This won't make much of a difference, but with the page growing and growing every few months I think it would be wise to move the spin-off sets to their respective namespaces. Same with the books, they're not sets at all so even if they're about Lego they should probably just get wholly separate pages. Realshow19 (talk) 03:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

I 👁 Image
 Agree, LEGO Minecraft Dungeons could probably be split to Dungeons:LEGO Minecraft or Dungeons:LEGO Minecraft Dungeons, Legends to Legends:LEGO Minecraft or Legends:LEGO Minecraft Legends, and A Minecraft Movie to Movie:LEGO Minecraft or Movie:LEGO A Minecraft Movie. 👁 Image
NmbrblcksFan (talk/edits) 03:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support ElGrenier (talk) 15:20, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support - I like the proposed names Dungeons:LEGO Minecraft, Legends:LEGO Minecraft, and Movie:LEGO Minecraft.Drour1234 (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

There is only one Legends set so far, so I 👁 Image
 Oppose the idea of Legends:LEGO Minecraft for now. If more are to be released in the future, it makes sense, but there's only one, so it would be a fairly short article. 👁 Image
 Support the other two, though. 👁 Image
PhoenixAsh89 (talk) (contribs) 15:47, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support per PhoenixAsh and Drour. Outrowed (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Now I think MCD:LEGO, MCL:LEGO, and AMCM:LEGO would be better names since AMCM:LEGO already exists. 👁 Image
NmF (talk) 17:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support - 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 15:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support - 2A00:23C8:229D:C301:7D11:7BD8:4DAC:AB78 13:17, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support. 👁 Image
PhoenixAsh89 (talk) (contribs) 15:46, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
 Support. –LauraFi - talk 07:44, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

We could have a separate page for minifigures, but splitting by year seems not useful. - Harri / Talk 👁 Image
16:17, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Created a quick mock-up of what a minifig page could look like, how's it look? Realshow19 (talk) 04:15, 1 March 2026 (UTC)