User talk:KorayTehGOAT

Don't add something like: "This is the first/final version to be released in 20xx" in the first section. Add it to the "Trivia" section. — Hoangminhle👁 Image
2011 — Shape our MCW 09:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

ok KorayTehGOAT () 10:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Don't even add it to the trivia section. I have been reverting your edits, and continued activity aloing this line will force me to block your account.

MCW:TRIVIA forbids "first" factoids. And many of the others you are adding are either already stated, or obvious. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

ok sorry please don't block me KorayTehGOAT () 20:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

That's OK, I know you're new here, and you've stopped doing this. Thanks for replying. Feel free to write a note on my talk page if you have any questions. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

ok KorayTehGOAT () 08:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

@KorayTehGOAT, I noticed that you edited a comment written by another user. Please do not edit comments unless they are your own. See MCW: talk page guidelines -~- Nerdyguy2000   talk   edits 02:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

ok KorayTehGOAT () 07:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Hey. When moving files without redirect (such as Special:Diff/2692083 or Special:Diff/2691388), please make sure to fix the file on all pages and, if possible, on all language wikis. You can find a list of all of the pages using the file (including non-English ones) at the bottom of the file page (under "File usage" and "Global file usage"). I know this can be quite tedious, but it'll be even more so for the person that will deal with it later. - Zamburger (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

ok, thanks. KorayTehGOAT () 07:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

can you guys ask me how to use the new additions table plz? KorayTehGOAT () 11:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

anybody? please. KorayTehGOAT () 06:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

please! KorayTehGOAT () 10:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

nobody asks me. :'( KorayTehGOAT () 10:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

The new additions table... The one that looks like an inventory? Sure, you could tell me how to use that. -~- Nerdyguy2000   Talk   Edits  16:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

yep nevermind, i already know how to use it. i just press the "Edit source" button and that's it. KorayTehGOAT () 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution, but do not add this template to dev version articles, it is unnecessary and too few items were added. 👁 Image
- 1108hng^Vnm 11:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

For more information, please see Template:Additions table/doc 👁 Image
- 1108hng^Vnm 11:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

ok yeah, but this will also make it easy to know what blocks are added in the dev versions, so i also wanted it to do like that. KorayTehGOAT () 12:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Can you provide the reason why are you creating sub pages under Java Edition block render history? All the information you are providing in these pages are already available in the main page. - 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 17:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC) 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 17:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Because, i'm gonna fill the Java Edition block render history/Alphabetical Order page with just alphabets by making the new pages for their own blocks. KorayTehGOAT () 17:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

And how is that useful? You can arrange all the blocks in the main page itself. If that is not possible, as it is not, then what is the use of having an alphabetically arranged list? Can you explain with more detail? - 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 17:45, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Well, because, This will excite me and make me happy while i of course make pages related to these. I mean like, Another reason is that, you can click on these pages and it can lead you to a block render history page. KorayTehGOAT () 17:49, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

How is that benefitting the wiki? Block render history for all blocks are in the main page. Creating separate pages for each is useless. Or do you have a reply for how it is beneficial? - 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 17:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Am i gonna remove the Java Edition block render history/Alphabetical Order page? Also, yes. I do have a reply for how it is beneficial. Just please don't block me. KorayTehGOAT () 17:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Nobody's blocking you, I'm just confirming if these edits of yours need attention or not. Anyone can make mistakes and even if these edits are proved to be useless, you did it with a good intention and will not face any kind of blocking, far from it. - 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 18:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

OK. KorayTehGOAT () 18:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

I was also gonna say that i'm gonna just use these to put into this page -> Java Edition block render history. KorayTehGOAT () 18:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

They are all already in the pages. What is the reason to make subpages for each one and add them back to the main pages? - 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 14:46, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Well, Pink Stained Glass Pane is the last section in this page. KorayTehGOAT () 14:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

It would be better to add all of these in the main page itself instead of creating subpages and then adding it. I would suggest you to stop creating this pages as I'm going forward for a mass revert proposal. Please don't take offence. - 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 15:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Uhh, OK. :( KorayTehGOAT () 15:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Hey Koray, I personally think you are doing great work and making the wiki better. You can find and comment on The Forum stizzurp mentioned here: Forum:Reverting/Deleting pages created as subpages of Java Edition block render history Mudscape 👁 Image
talk 15:28, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank You. :) KorayTehGOAT () 15:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Please stop creating subpages until the discussion is going on. You can continue when the consensus is in your favor. - 👁 Image
StizzurpXDD^(talk) 15:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

OK? KorayTehGOAT () 15:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Can you teach me how to make my own template please? KorayTehGOAT () 07:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Please, can you teach me how to delete the page? Please! KorayTehGOAT () 15:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Like, not my own page. I mean the example of the page. KorayTehGOAT () 15:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

You need sysop rights to delete pages. Arina (she/her) 15:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

place {{d|reason}} to the page 👁 Image
Miner(👁 Image
talk 👁 Image
contributions) 15:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

But then if i delete it, it says that Staffs, CATS and Admins can delete this page. How can i do now? KorayTehGOAT () 15:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

The page will be listed here and then you need just wait for admin to delete it 👁 Image
Miner(👁 Image
talk 👁 Image
contributions) 06:22, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

OK. I hope i'll gonna be an Admin. :) KorayTehGOAT () 11:02, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Why? Because, i want to get my 4000th edit. KorayTehGOAT () 11:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Okay, I got my 4000th edit. Am i an admin rn? KorayTehGOAT () 10:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

OK, nvm. KorayTehGOAT () 11:53, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

How did donkeys, mules, skeleton and zombie horses even received a texture change in snapshot 23w03a? KorayTehGOAT () 14:28, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

@YoureIronic KorayTehGOAT () 11:04, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

wdym - Ironic 👁 Image
02:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Go to Java Edition 23w03a right now. then, go to the "Changes" section. You'll literally see that Donkeys, Mules, Skeleton Horses and Zombie Horses had their texture changed. KorayTehGOAT () 05:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

yeah? - Ironic 👁 Image
06:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

And then, go to "Mobs" section? KorayTehGOAT () 06:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Should the april fool things be added? Ironic 👁 Image
06:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes, ofc! That's what i wanted to do it too! =D KorayTehGOAT () 07:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

@YoureIronic, will the mob, block and item texture and model history pages actually gonna be created there?

See this page for example. KorayTehGOAT () 20:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Isnt that just remaking block/Asset history? - Ironic 👁 Image
02:00, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Yes? KorayTehGOAT () 07:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

It's always been like this. The reason behind this rule is for consistence with other version pages, and to skip unnecessary data when loading from limited connections. It is also misleading to put renders everywhere in a changelog. Please fix your changes (I already fixed pages to follow this rule a thousand times before, I'm tired of doing it over and over again). Affected pages range from 1.6-1.0, probably more. User-100181356 (talk) 12:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi!
I've noticed that you've been adding [[Category:Java Edition entity render history subpages]] along with {{THS}}. I'm just letting you know that you don't have to do that as the THS template automatically adds the page to the category.

Also, you should wrap the gallery with <onlyinclude> as it being trascluded to the Java Edition entity render history page. Thank you! - Ssysi - talk 11:32, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

OK. You're welcome. KorayTehGOAT () 11:38, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Adding the category link there is not needed, the template already does that. See line 29. - Ssysi - talk 18:39, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

I was only listing them in the category page. See Category:Java Edition entity render history subpages. KorayTehGOAT () 18:44, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

That's what the template does. Any page with {{THS|je mob}} will be added to that category. - Ssysi - talk 18:47, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Oh, OK. KorayTehGOAT () 19:07, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

I see that you've been splitting a lot of history tables into sections for separate editions. Note that a discussion about reorganizing history tables is still ongoing at Forum:Compact history table, and for the time being the "old" history table format is still preferred, which also have clear sections for editions. It's unnecessary to revert your changes now because it might be the standard format at a later point, but it's also unnecessary to continue splitting history tables. Also note that the Java Edition and Bedrock Edition sections must always be italicized, even in section headers. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk) (contribs) 👁 Image
11:34, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

You are continuing to split history tables. Please italicize the headers or stop making these unnecessary edits. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk) (contribs) 👁 Image
14:51, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

OK then, i'm making it italicized this time. KorayTehGOAT () 10:09, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Just stop doing it to pages until the discussion concludes, please.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  10:12, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

OK. KorayTehGOAT () 10:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Also, @Nixinova, when will the discussion conclude? KorayTehGOAT () 15:42, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Koray, why are you doing it again?! -- Simanelix ^(T|C) 14:17, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Extremely strong support KorayTehGOAT () 11:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

What benefit do you think there is to creating these sounds subpages for mobs? For blocks, I'm pretty sure sound subpages only exist if the sound type is used by various blocks. - Harri / Talk 👁 Image
13:38, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Yes of course, sound subpages also exist if the sound type is also used by various mobs and entities. That's the reason why i'm creating the sound subpages for mobs too. KorayTehGOAT () 13:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

"This is the history table that splits editions that make it simple to read. Also, all editions except legacy console edition will now be italicized." - This is a confusing edit summary for splitting the history tables. Nothing's wrong, but it just makes people expect a different content to the edit than what is actually there. This first sentence sounds like the caption to an image, not an edit summary, and so one would expect some explanatory sentence to follow it which isn't present; and the second makes it seem like you're changing existing edition labels to be italicised, which isn't the case you're just adding the sub headers. Condensing it to "History table: split editions to make it simple to read" makes more sense to what your edits are.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  10:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

So, am i just gonna condense it to "History table: split editions to make it simple to read" to make the edit summary no longer confusing? KorayTehGOAT () 10:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

You don't have to if you like the current summary better, I'm just offering a summary that in my opinion is clearer based on what I thought when I first saw these edits.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  10:46, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Also, I'm no longer making existing edition labels italicized. Does that also never be confusing? KorayTehGOAT () 11:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Don't know what you mean.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  07:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Check this page for example. KorayTehGOAT () 08:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

The editions (Java, Bedrock, PS4, Education) should still be italic.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  08:16, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Oh, well, ok. KorayTehGOAT () 08:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Also, what about New Nintendo 3DS Edition? Would this also be italic? KorayTehGOAT () 08:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Yes, See mcw:ITALICS.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  08:52, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. KorayTehGOAT () 08:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
There is currently a discussion at the admin noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 👁 Image
Dazzle 👁 Image
14:37, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Per consensus and own judgement, I have granted you the MCW:Autopatrol right. This means that your edits don't have to be checked by patrollers and allows you to not leave redirects when moving pages. Thank you for you edits to the wiki! ~~  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  09:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome. KorayTehGOAT () 10:42, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

👁 Image
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to the Minecraft Wiki, as you did at Java Edition 26.1 Snapshot 3. Your edits continue to seemingly constitute harmful or disruptive editing and have been reverted. If you want to experiment, please use our sandbox or if you're a registered user, your own sandbox. Repeated violations of our rules can result in the loss of editing privileges. Hoglins and piglins not attacking players is not something that would corrupt your world. 👁 Bepis
17:58, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Nothing he did warranted a warning, a level 2 one at that. 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
18:09, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I just didn't mistake anything in this page. Hoglins and zoglins LITERALLY no longer attack players and entities and just runs close to them due to a bug in this snapshot (Java Edition 26.1 Snapshot 3). That doesn't mean it can "corrupt your world". KorayTehGOAT () 18:40, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

I said "corrupt your world" because you added it on a dangerous version template. 👁 Bepis
18:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Then what template i'm gonna add to add a bug there? KorayTehGOAT () 18:53, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Im pretty sure we dont typically document bugs that dont cause actual damage to the game (cases where {{dangerous version}} would be used), so it probably doesnt need to be added 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
19:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok. I guess. KorayTehGOAT () 19:33, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

You need create request on MCW:AN for they rename this page. Transferring the page content without saving the edit history is unacceptable. — Ivan-r ru.Wiki admin 12:09, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

This village structure was actually called "Tool Smith House", not "Tool Smith House 1" tho. KorayTehGOAT () 20:49, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I understand. But renaming can't be done the way YOU did it. — Ivan-r ru.Wiki admin 14:55, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, when tagging block render pages for deletion, could you make sure they aren't transcluded anywhere? Thanks! 👁 Image
amethyst_hhh👁 Image
15:50, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

ok. KorayTehGOAT () 15:51, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Just a note, this isn't going to do anything, as visual editor edits add them back anyway.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  12:12, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I know. I'm just doing this so that it would be better without those file prefixes. KorayTehGOAT () 12:19, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

It does not do anything, even in the source editor no one cares when there's a prefix or not. Rather, I've experienced that saving galleries in visual editor when there aren't prefixes can sometimes glitch and undo all work, so it is unconstructive. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk) (contribs) 👁 Image
12:22, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Its not better -- it doesn't do anything, and gets undone automatically in subsequent edits. So best not to make edits that accomplish nothing please.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  12:27, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Ok. KorayTehGOAT () 13:26, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

You're still massively making useless edits, just stop. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk) (contribs) 👁 Image
18:57, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Okay. KorayTehGOAT () 19:21, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Also, I'm now adding the file prefixes back. Is that okay? KorayTehGOAT () 14:53, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

That's even worse. Just stop caring about file prefixes. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk) (contribs) 👁 Image
16:43, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Okay.. KorayTehGOAT () 16:45, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Again, you are wasting your time adding them back. Stop it. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk) (contribs) 👁 Image
14:10, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Why are you added Item Form on Block Render History pages isnt that for a different article GloopyBoopy (talk) 20:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm actually doing that because it would be way better with item forms. Also, just because blocks have item form variants, doesn't mean they're considered "items". KorayTehGOAT () 20:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://minecraft.wiki/w/User_talk:KorayTehGOAT?oldid=3647699"